Written/Reviewed by:
Last Updated: September 30, 2026
Reading time: Est 18 minutes
When parents separate, custody becomes the issue that matters most. California judges decide custody by asking what arrangement serves children’s best interests. The standard sounds objective, almost clinical. In practice, judges have wide latitude in how they interpret it. Your involvement as a parent, the stability of your home, the quality of your relationship with your kids, and how you’ve handled conflict with the other parent all of it factors into what a judge ultimately decides.
Our San Jose, CA child custody lawyer helps parents manage this process and present their situations effectively. Schank Family Law has worked on custody cases throughout Santa Clara County for over two decades now. We understand local procedures, know how mandatory mediation operates in this county, and have represented parents across every type of custody dispute you can imagine.
Christian L. Schank started this firm in 2003 after finishing law school at the University of La Verne College of Law. He’d completed his undergraduate work at Brigham Young University before that. From day one, the firm handled family law exclusively.
That decision to specialize makes a big difference for our clients. Martindale-Hubbell gave Christian an AV Rating back in 2000, which represents their highest mark for professional excellence and ethical conduct. He carries Lead Counsel Verified status for family law as well.
Custody cases present challenges you won’t find in other family law work. Parents must attend mandatory mediation before any contested hearing in Santa Clara County. Evidence about parenting involvement and children’s needs requires different preparation than financial documentation in a property case. The emotional stakes run higher, and that intensity affects how cases unfold.
We’ve guided parents through initial custody fights, modification requests when circumstances changed, contentious move-away disputes, and enforcement actions when one parent ignored court orders. When parents violate custody arrangements, we pursue consequences. Our attorneys have prosecuted contempt actions that resulted in 95 counts against a parent who repeatedly disregarded what the court ordered.
Our family lawyer in San Jose, CA covers the full range of custody work, from relatively amicable negotiations to high-conflict litigation requiring aggressive advocacy.
Custody fights generate anxiety that property disputes simply don’t produce. Parents lie awake worrying about their children, uncertain what the process involves or how long it takes or what they should be doing to prepare.
We address that uncertainty by communicating clearly throughout the case. Strategy gets explained in plain language. Clients receive thorough preparation before mediation sessions and court appearances. Updates come consistently rather than only when we need something. Knowing what to expect and how to participate makes a difficult situation easier to manage.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Thank you Mr. Schank and Neelamjeet for the Dedication and integrity, the restriction was finally lifted, and I was able to regain custody of my son. Your firm stood by me until the very end, and for that, I am eternally grateful.” — Karen Diez
Read more reviews on our Google Business Profile.
California separates custody into two categories. Legal custody covers who makes major decisions about children’s lives. Physical custody addresses where children actually live and how time gets divided between households. Our attorneys work on both.
State law provides the framework judges use when making custody decisions. Understanding these rules helps parents prepare realistically.
Family Code Section 3011 spells out what courts consider when evaluating children’s best interests. The list includes children’s health, safety, and welfare along with each parent’s history of contact and involvement. Courts also examine whether either parent has committed abuse and whether either parent struggles with substance use or alcohol.
Gender plays no role. Mothers don’t receive automatic preference, and neither do fathers. Courts evaluate both parents by identical standards.
Family Code Section 3020 states California’s policy position: children generally benefit from maintaining frequent contact with both parents following separation. That policy shapes how courts approach custody decisions, creating a presumption favoring arrangements that preserve meaningful relationships on both sides.
But the policy isn’t absolute. When circumstances make shared involvement unsafe or impractical, courts adjust accordingly.
Family Code Section 3010 gives mothers and fathers equal custody rights. No preference based on gender. Both parents enter custody proceedings on equal footing under the law.
Family Code Section 3044 addresses situations where one parent has committed domestic violence within the past five years. The law presumes that awarding custody to that parent would not serve children’s best interests. Overcoming the presumption requires evidence, and the burden falls on the parent with the abuse history.
General information about custody procedures appears on the California Courts website.
Santa Clara County won’t hold a contested custody hearing until parents have tried mediation. Both parents attend an orientation, then meet with a mediator from Family Court Services. The mediator tries to help parents find enough agreement to resolve disputed issues without a judge’s involvement.
Sometimes mediation works. Parents compromise, and the mediator helps document what they’ve agreed upon. Other times, it doesn’t. When parents remain at an impasse, the mediator may submit recommendations to the court describing what arrangement seems appropriate.
Judges often give those recommendations significant weight. The mediator met with both parents, possibly with the children too, and formed impressions based on direct observation. Preparation matters because mediation outcomes frequently shape final results.
We get clients ready for these sessions by explaining the process, discussing what to emphasize, and identifying potential areas of compromise that might narrow the dispute.
Legal custody concerns decision-making power. Which school will the children attend? Who decides about medical treatment? What religious upbringing, if any, will they receive? Can they participate in travel sports that require significant time and expense?
Parents can share joint legal custody even when one parent has primary physical custody. Both participate in major decisions regardless of where children spend most nights.
Physical custody determines living arrangements and how parenting time divides. Joint physical custody means both parents have substantial time, though not necessarily equal. Some schedules split time close to evenly. Others give one parent primary physical custody while the other has regular parenting time on weekends and certain weekdays.
Detailed written plans reduce future conflict by answering questions before they arise. The plan should address weekly schedules, holiday arrangements, summer vacation, birthdays, school breaks, pickup and dropoff logistics, and procedures for handling disagreements.
Courts expect parents to propose reasonable plans. Judges don’t want to design schedules from scratch when parents could have done that work themselves.
Effective plans account for practical realities. School locations, work schedules, children’s activities, transportation logistics, and how exchanges will actually occur in practice. Plans that look fine on paper sometimes collapse because they ignore how the family actually functions.
We help clients develop plans that protect parental relationships while serving children’s needs.
California permits children to express custody preferences. Under Family Code Section 3042, children who are 14 or older may generally address the court if they wish to share their views.
That doesn’t mean children decide outcomes. Their preferences represent one consideration among many. Courts also evaluate whether a parent has coached or pressured the child, and they weigh expressed wishes against other evidence about each household.
Supporting children through divorce involves understanding their developmental needs and shielding them from adult conflict as much as possible.
Custody decisions depend on evidence. Judges want to see documentation of parental involvement: school records showing attendance at conferences and events, medical records listing who brings children to appointments, sign-up sheets from coaching or volunteering, photographs from activities and outings.
Parents who can demonstrate consistent hands-on involvement present stronger cases. We help clients identify what documentation exists, gather it systematically, and organize it for effective presentation.
Court orders only matter if both parents follow them. When one parent denies custodial time, blocks communication, or otherwise violates the arrangement, enforcement becomes necessary.
We pursue contempt proceedings against parents who ignore court orders. Sanctions can include fines, make-up parenting time, and jail in serious cases. Repeated violations also support modifying custody toward the cooperative parent. Courts consider each parent’s willingness to support the children’s relationship with the other parent, and chronic interference demonstrates unwillingness.
Understanding common misconceptions about custody helps parents approach proceedings with accurate expectations.
Custody arrangements established now typically become the foundation for years ahead. Modifications remain possible when circumstances change substantially, but the original structure often persists because courts value stability for children.
Presenting your situation effectively requires understanding local procedures, preparing thoroughly for mediation, and organizing evidence around what courts actually consider. Family law represents our entire practice, and custody work constitutes a significant portion of what we handle.
Schank Family Law offers free case evaluations. We will review your circumstances, explain how California law applies, and discuss what a path forward might look like. Contact us today to schedule a conversation.
1. Start documenting your daily involvement with your children now. Write down school drop-offs, meal preparation, bedtime routines, medical appointments, and extracurricular activities with specific dates and times.
2. Gather school records, medical records, and activity registrations. Report cards, attendance records, immunization records, and sign-up forms for sports or lessons all establish which parent handles the logistical side of parenting.
3. Save all communications with the other parent. Text messages, emails, and app-based messages that show cooperation, conflict, or the other parent’s behavior create a record the court can review.
4. Prepare for mandatory mediation through Family Court Services. Santa Clara County requires mediation before most contested custody hearings. The mediator’s recommendation carries weight with judges, so walk in with a clear, child-focused proposal.
5. Draft a proposed parenting plan before your first hearing. Include a weekly schedule, holiday rotation, vacation time, transportation responsibilities, and decision-making authority. Judges respond well to parents who arrive with a specific, workable plan.
6. Identify your childcare arrangements. If you work during hours when the children would be in your care, know who watches them, where, and how long that arrangement has been in place. Courts evaluate the stability and quality of each parent’s childcare.
7. Avoid making unilateral changes to the children’s routine. Enrolling children in a new school, moving to a different neighborhood, or changing their healthcare provider without the other parent’s agreement can backfire in court.
8. Do not discuss the case with your children. Putting children in the middle of a custody dispute harms them and damages your credibility with the judge. Courts take parental alienation seriously.
9. Address any issues the other side might raise. If you have a DUI from five years ago, a period of unemployment, or a history of conflict, talk to your attorney about how to present context rather than letting the other parent define the narrative.
10. Consult with a custody attorney before agreeing to temporary orders. Temporary arrangements frequently become the baseline for permanent orders because courts value stability. Do not accept less time than you want long-term without understanding the implications.
California’s custody framework starts from a clear policy position. Family Code Section 3020 declares that children benefit from frequent and continuing contact with both parents after separation, and that public policy favors assuring children have this contact. That statute drives custody decisions across Santa Clara County.
The U.S. Census Bureau reports that Santa Clara County has roughly 1.9 million residents and a substantial population of families with children under 18. When those families go through separation or divorce, custody becomes the most contested issue in many cases. According to Judicial Council data, family law filings remain among the largest case categories in the county’s superior court system, and a significant share involve disputed custody.
Santa Clara County’s demographics create custody dynamics that differ from less urban or less affluent areas. Both parents frequently work full-time in demanding professional roles. Dual-income households earning $200,000 or more are common, which means neither parent can argue that the other should be the primary caretaker simply because of income disparity. Instead, cases often turn on who actually handled the day-to-day parenting during the marriage, even when both parents earned substantial salaries.
The county’s Family Court Services office conducts mandatory mediation at the Family Justice Center Courthouse, 201 North First Street in San Jose. Mediation is confidential in Santa Clara County, meaning the mediator does not report what was said to the judge. However, if the parents cannot agree, the mediator issues a recommendation on custody and visitation. That recommendation is not binding, but local judges give it considerable weight because the mediator has met with both parents and often with the children.
Joint custody arrangements have become increasingly common in this county. Family Code Section 3080 creates a presumption favoring joint custody when both parents request it, and many Santa Clara County judges view equal or near-equal timeshare as the starting point when both parents are fit and geographically close.
Legal custody gives a parent authority to make decisions about the child’s education, healthcare, and welfare. Physical custody determines where the child lives. Courts can award joint or sole versions of each, and the two types are decided independently.
No. California law is gender-neutral. Under Family Code Section 3010, both parents have equal rights to custody. Outcomes depend on evidence about parenting history, stability, and each parent’s willingness to support the child’s relationship with the other parent.
The court evaluates the child’s health, safety, and welfare; any history of abuse by either parent; the nature of each parent’s contact with the child; and substance abuse issues. Which parent is more likely to facilitate a cooperative relationship with the other parent also carries weight.
Yes, by showing a material change in circumstances since the current order was entered. Common reasons include relocation, changes in work schedules, substance abuse, the child’s changing needs, or one parent consistently violating the existing order.
Both parents meet with a trained mediator to discuss custody and visitation. The mediator helps parents try to reach agreement. If no agreement is reached, the mediator may issue a recommendation to the judge. Preparing for mediation matters significantly because the recommendation often shapes the outcome.
A finding of domestic violence within the past five years creates a rebuttable presumption against custody for the parent who committed the abuse under Family Code Section 3044. The presumption can be overcome, but it requires substantial evidence of rehabilitation.
California law allows judges to consider a child’s preference if the child is of sufficient age and maturity. Under Family Code Section 3042, children 14 and older must be allowed to address the court unless the judge determines it would not be in their best interest. Younger children’s preferences may also be considered.
Move-away cases are among the most heavily litigated custody disputes. The relocating parent must give reasonable notice. If you object, the court evaluates whether the move serves the children’s best interests, considering factors like the reason for the move, the children’s ties to the current community, and the feasibility of maintaining the other parent’s relationship.
Simple cases where parents reach agreement at mediation can resolve in a few months. Contested cases requiring evaluation, discovery, and trial can take a year or longer. The court’s calendar and the complexity of the issues both affect timing.
Under limited circumstances. Grandparent visitation requires demonstrating a preexisting bond and that visitation serves the child’s best interests, balanced against parental rights. Grandparents can seek custody when placement with either parent would be detrimental to the child.
A court-appointed evaluator interviews both parents, observes parent-child interactions, reviews documents, and may speak with teachers, therapists, and other relevant people. The evaluator then issues a report with custody recommendations. These evaluations are expensive but can be decisive in contested cases.
Document every violation. You can file a motion for contempt of court or request a modification of the order. Courts take violations seriously, and a pattern of noncompliance can result in the violating parent losing custody time.
Be cautious. Temporary orders create a status quo that courts are reluctant to disrupt later because stability matters to children. Do not agree to an arrangement that gives you less time than you want permanently without understanding how difficult it may be to change later.
Sole custody is possible but typically requires showing that joint custody would be detrimental to the child. Situations involving abuse, substance addiction, abandonment, or a parent who is genuinely unable to provide safe care may justify sole custody.
Fees vary based on whether the case resolves at mediation or requires trial. Schank Family Law uses a retainer structure with hourly billing against a trust account balance.
Custody cases in Santa Clara County begin when one parent files a petition, either as part of a divorce or as a standalone parentage action. The court orders both parents to attend mediation through Family Court Services before the judge hears contested issues.
If mediation produces an agreement, the court enters it as an order and the case can move forward on other issues. If mediation fails, the mediator issues a recommendation, and the case proceeds to a contested hearing. Both sides present evidence, testimony, and sometimes expert reports. The judge then issues custody and visitation orders based on the children’s best interests.
Outcomes depend heavily on several factors: the degree of each parent’s involvement before separation, the quality of each parent’s proposed plan, the stability of each household, each parent’s willingness to co-parent, and whether either parent has a history of domestic violence or substance abuse.
Several agencies in Santa Clara County handle matters that intersect with custody proceedings.
Schank Family Law is not affiliated with and does not endorse any of the organizations listed above. This information is provided for reference purposes only.
111 N Market St #1020
San Jose, CA 95113
Speak with an experienced attorney about your family law case.
"*" indicates required fields
Attorney Christian L. Schank founded Schank Family Law in 2003. With eight offices and a Certified Family Law Specialist on staff, the firm handles divorce, custody, support, and property matters in courts across the state.
Contact our office to schedule a free case evaluation. Tell us about your family law matter and learn how our attorneys can help.
"*" indicates required fields